Access to their music.
Never ownership of it.
A label needs to hear an artist's unreleased work, keep track of which version is current, and answer everyone who sent something. What it does not need is to be holding somebody's masters, and what an artist will not agree to is a tool where the label might be.
So the line is drawn in the database rather than in a contract. You get access. They keep everything. Both sides can stop worrying about it and get on with the record.
You get access.
Never ownership.
An artist's music belongs to the artist here, including on your roster and including when you are paying for their account.
You see what they choose to show you. They can withdraw it without asking you and without telling us why. Ending the arrangement removes your access and deletes nothing of theirs.
That is enforced in the database rather than only written in the terms, which matters to both sides of the conversation. It is the reason an artist says yes to being on a label's roster in a shared tool, and it is the reason a label can offer one without arguing about it first.
You can cover a signed artist's plan for six euro a month. They keep the account, the catalogue and the right to walk away with all of it.
The audio arrives
and stays arrived
Demos land on a page that belongs to you, with the real file attached rather than a link to somewhere else.
- Vela Slow Weather Shortlisted 2 days ago
- Ninth House Carrion Rated 4 9 days ago
- Marisa Quint Paper Harbour Declined on day 21 4 January
A fast no is worth
more than silence
Artists talk to each other. The label that never replies is the one they warn each other about, and it costs you the demo you wanted next year.
Dates neither of you
has to take on trust
Every file's fingerprint is folded into one number published each night. Either side can prove what existed on a given day, without asking us.
"We sent that in January" against "we never received it" cannot be settled by a timestamp, because every timestamp in the argument belongs to somebody with a stake in the answer. Ours least of all: we are the other side's supplier.
So the dates are not ours to assert. The fingerprints recorded on a given day are combined into a single value that is published and never rewritten. An artist with the original file, or a label with the copy it was sent, can recompute that value and compare it against what was published. We are not part of the comparison and cannot alter it after the fact.
What it proves is narrow and worth stating plainly. It shows a file with that exact fingerprint was in our records on that date. It does not prove who made it, and no timestamp anywhere can. How it works, and how to check it yourself.
Know who actually
listened
Promos go out as a link per person, so the answer is a name rather than a number.
This is not for
every label
If you need distribution, this is not it. Nothing here delivers to Spotify or collects royalties, and it is not going to. Keep the distributor you have.
If you get five demos a month, you do not have this problem. An inbox and a folder are working fine, and a subscription would be solving something you have not got.
If you want to own the recordings outright inside the tool, look elsewhere. The rule above is not negotiable and not configurable, and a label that needs it to be will be happier somewhere that agrees.
We would rather say this now than have you find it out in month three.
Two plans, and
no per-artist fee
Storage is pooled, so one artist with a deep archive does not push another over a limit. Roster size is not a billing question: you pay for space and seats, not for how many artists you work with. Covering a signed artist's own plan is six euro a month on top, and optional.
Have a look before
you move anything
Set up a demo page in a few minutes and point one artist at it. Nothing needs migrating to find out whether this fits how you already work.
If you are moving from something else, say so when you get in touch. We would rather tell you it is a bad fit early than take a month of your subscription to reach the same answer.